Sunday, January 25, 2009

This week’s readings have focused on the state policy and its impacts on the environment. The treadmill of production in particular bets explains the relationship between the state and the environment. “The treadmill of production is a system in which we can observe the increasing accumulation of wealth and investments into capital intensive technologies, rising social inequalities and greater ecological withdrawals and additions, all of which are encouraged and facilitated by the nation-state” (48). The treadmill of production was present in many of the argument presented by Simon.

Simon’s presentation addressed various aspects of the readings discussed in class which included imperialism, exclusion, ecological violence and a focus on the state. Simon’s view of the state was very critical by addressing how the state did not exist due to the fact that they could not respond to social pressures, and their lack of choice on policies or forms. Furthermore, he saw the state as a terrain of struggle where social classes presumed the outcome of the state. Since states have evolved since times of Ancient Greece, he explained how the state is in fact a tool to reflect the dominant classes.

Society is always negatively impacting the ecological process, especially in the Third World. His example of his research in India further strengthened this argument due to its production of roses. In a state in which does not have tremendous water supply is now depleting their resources to sustain their economy. However, after a few years of this the environment will be negatively impacted. Next, I was interested to how Simon connected the relationship of the capitalism to the environment. People have to sell their labor power in exchange for wages. Nature is controlled by capital in means of material; all items exchanged must have a use value. To define a commodity it is not determined by the ecological practices therefore this leads to pollution quotas.

Overall, the relationship between capitalism and the environment is not equal. To make profit environments and their resources are being exhausted, people are being demoralized while states are being undermined, and this cycle will only persist and worsen as time continues. As time continues, the Third World will further experience the consequences of the actions in the west. These actions put further stress on the environments of those in horrific situations in the first place.

2 comments:

  1. I agree that this relationship is not equal and is quite detrimental! And all will continue to feel the consequences if they do not belong to the ruling elite classes. Especially when we commodify everything from human capital to the commons. We are currently seeing the treadmill of production create new markets based on what has been regarded as 'public' such as water. There is pressure globally for countries to privatize their water sources- Australia is learning that lesson at the moment as they sold their water to private companies and the Murray-Darling river is drying up (it is comparable to the St. Lawrence in Canada) from depletion. This is occurring across the globe- water sources just drying up. And as you said these relationships put further stress on the environment and also the people, the social consequences will continue to worsen if we don't make change a priority!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Water resoources are currently a major issue worldwide. The privatization of water occured in Bolivia and there are attempts in India. The privatization of water also causes many environmental health issues in addition to social and environmental problems. Due to the fact that most diseases today are due to water borne illnesses in developing countries. The reprocussions for the privatization of water is not worth the price!

    ReplyDelete